Classical variational phase-field models cannot predict fracture nucleation
Notwithstanding the evidence against them, classical variational phase-field models continue to be used and pursued in an attempt to describe fracture nucleation in elastic brittle materials. In this context, the main objective of the first part of this talk is to provide a comprehensive review of the existing evidence against such a class of models as descriptors of fracture nucleation. To that end, a review is first given of the plethora of experimental observations of fracture nucleation in nominally elastic brittle materials under quasi-static loading conditions, as well as of classical variational phase-field models, with and without energy splits. These models are then confronted with the experimental observations. The conclusion is that they cannot possibly describe fracture nucleation in general. This is because classical variational phase-field models cannot account for material strength as an independent macroscopic material property. The second part of the talk will introduce an emergent class of phase-field models that can predict fracture nucleation. Emphasis will be placed on a recent model by Lopez-Pamies and collaborators (2020), which is a natural generalization of the phase-field regularization of the variational theory of brittle fracture of Francfort and Marigo (1998). In particular, I will highlight our recent work that includes a complete quantitative analysis of where and when fractures nucleate and propagate in Brazilian tests (static and dynamic) and how to interpret their results appropriately. Finally, I will share a recent result that illustrates how this emergent class of phase-field models can be recast in a variational setting. This talk is a result of joint efforts with Yangyuanchen Liu, Oscar Lopez-Pamies, Gilles Francfort, and Christopher Larsen.